Idea 2.5
I wanted to experiment with how intimate I could make the performance so I decided I would have one on one poetry reading with members of the public. Personally I find my poems special, yes of course that’s because I am bias but also because for a long time I never read them to anyone or even told anyone that I write poetry. I wanted to see if I could instil that same feeling within the people I talked to. The way in which I tried to makes the poems seem special for the single audience member was by telling them that after I read them the poem I will destroy it and it shall never be said again.
But then again I could ruin this feeling of feeling unique or special by introducing the possibility that I lied to them. The reason I did this was Sara Felder an award-winning playwright and soloist talks about “juggling the truth” and what effect this can have on an audience.
“A few audience members disclosed to me their deep sense of betrayal and disgust when they found out that a touching story presented as autobiographical theatre was based on a lie” (Felder, 2012, 39).
What I find interesting about this is that it shows the level of the audience’s attentiveness and investment into a performance.
(Mighty, 2014). A video of me experimenting with idea 2.5*
When I told the blonde haired woman that what I had previously told her might have been a lie, she was only slightly shocked. Whereas when I told the older lady that it might be a lie, she replied saying it would be “disappointing”. They both had a completely different level of attentiveness to the poems and this could be seen through their responses. However not letting them know if it is truth or a lie, allows them to choose/hope for the scenario that is most satisfying for them. This acts as a sort of post-performance because they continue to think about which is their more favourable outcome and mentally involves them in the small performance.
Citations
Felder, S. (2012). JUGGLING the Truth. Theatre Bay Area, 38-41.